[SDK] DA62 sample hasn't been updated

Is it possible to update the DA62 sample? It hasn’t been updated since August.

Hello. We can consider it. Did you notice a difference with the official Da62
package? Regards, Sylvain

We use this sample to guide us how to do things, so it would be ideal to add
some of the latest changes in the SDK on the sample to help us to understand
the implementation, such as:

  • Materials animation.
  • RTC Cameras implementation
  • New Prop Physics.
  • New AP pilots variables.
  • Etc.

Best, Raul

The Da62 is a straight copy from the retail version. It’s not modified by the
SDK team to specifically demonstrate new features. I agree this would be good
to consider it as a demonstration aircraft that benefits from the new features
whenever possible. In the meantime, we are creating some dedicated samples: -
there will be a RTCAircraft to demonstrate new RTC mechanics - We are also
working on revamping the Materials sample so that it demonstrates way more
things, material animations included Regards, Sylvain

Oh I see, understood. In this case can I please provide some feedback? you
guys are changing lots of things in the SDK regarding aircraft development,
this goes with SU8 new Props Physics, I watched the Q&A; today and SU9 / SU10
will bring new stuff such as new sym forces, etc. which we can enable for
airplanes. It was explained on the video these things (the prop physics) and
the new air flow forces have been added to the Cessna. As a 3rd party
developer, it is quiet hard to catch up with these changes, specially if we do
not have good examples, so perhaps it would be more useful to have the Cessna
as the SDK sample? so every time you guys add these things, we get to see the
sample of how it is done? sometimes the SDK descriptions are not very good
self explanatory for these new properties since quiet understandable they are
coming new and fresh to the sim… So having a project to play with, where we
have the entire source code, etc. might help us better to reverse engineer
what is required, what each parameter do, etc. Just my thoughts… All the
best, Raul

The C172 was used for the features you mentioned but it changes from time to
time, it will be the A320 or F18 for some others. We develop a new feature
when we need for a particular aircraft most of the time. But we agree we
should have a SDK flagship demonstrating as much features as possible. This is
being discussed. In the meantime, we’ll do our best improving the existing
samples and documentation based on your feedback.
@SonantAlpaca FYI

Thanks so much Sylvain. Best, Raul