[SU5.1] 1.7.30 SDK 1.6.9 Electrical System example in SDK docs - missing/incorrect info - Bus

Version: *1.7.30 SDK 1.6.9

Frequency: Consistently

Severity: *Low
(Low - quality of life, workflow optimization, rare enough to not impact production, etc…
High - critical but workarounds are available, important feature not working as expected, frequent enough to impact production
Blocker - prevents from working on the project, prevents from releasing the product)

Marketplace package name: if applicable

Context: What package? When editing or mounted from Community? In main menu or in flight? etc…

Similar MSFS 2020 issue: insert url here if applicable

Bug description:

Electrical Systems - Bus description is missing Wear and tear. The DA62 sample has wear and tear parameters, however the bus description has no indication that is is a parameter that can be used.

Repro steps:

Attachments:

Private attachments: Send a PM to @PrivateContent with the link to this topic and the link to download your content

Hello @DA40CGDFQ

The documentation is correct on this, WearAndTearCollision is only applicable for batteries, generators and circuits.
We will review this and make sure the property is only exposed when applicable.

Regards,
Sylvain

1 Like

Thanks, as another issue with the DA62 sample. line 65,66 have a ConA(Starter_BUS, StarterA) there is no Starter_Bus you mean RH_Main_Bus.

Line 80 and 81 have this issue also.

line 85 has the A source connection as RH_Eng_ECU_BUS_A - should be RH_Eng_ECU_BUS_B as the line name suggests

There is one, bus.12 in Function_Interior systems.cfg

Apologize, I was not clear.

The name of the line is

line.65 = Name:RH_Main_BUSToStarterA # Connection:ConA(Starter_Bus,StarterA)#WearAndTearCollision:NoseDamageHigh,TailTopDamageHigh,TailBottomDamageHigh,EngineLeftDamageMedium,EngineRightDamageMedium,LeftWingDamageLow,RightWingDamageLow

This does not agree with the connection - Starter_Bus, StarterA - there is a RH_Main_BUS. So this confuses my program that reads in cfg files.
OK, line names are not a key item, but thought it would help decipher things. I will have to review my logic, thanks

Ah ok my bad :sweat_smile:
Adding it to the list of items to review.